No product activation in Visual Studio.NET 2003? Why not?
I was just redoing one of my machines today and wondered again why there’s no product activation for Visual Studio.NET 2003? As I was popping in each MSDN DVD I had to provide PID’s for Windows XP, for Office 2003, for OneNote, for FrontPage, etc.
Pop in VS.NET and what’s this, not even a request for a PID, my my I wonder why that is? Surely one of Microsoft’s more expensive and powerful applications would at least ask for a PID and then require activation. But no, it doesn’t, it simply installs the best development environment available today.
I haven’t seen a retail box so I can’t say that it doesn’t actually ask for a PID at some point but I’ve never seen a copy installed that has asked for one let alone asked to be activated. I’ve still got my boxed copy of Visual Studio 6 sitting up in the closet and that copy doesn’t require a PID either (I checked again just to make sure). What’s with this?
My take is that it’s an evil mind control plot to get more developers onto Microsoft’s development platform. There’s plenty of releases of Ent. Arch. going around the net (yeah it’s 5 CD’s but nm). It’s like Microsoft is saying,
“yeah sure we’ll protect our IP and way of business but this time it’s okay, we want you to use this for free, you’ll create more stuff for Windows and indirectly make us money anyway. So here ya go you little script kiddy, have fun with this, learn to program the Microsoft way, you’ll love it, it sure as hell beats that pie in the sky Sun thingamabob mocha almond fudge Java stuff”.
“why thank you
Anyway, pardon the 4AM ramblings, but if Office and Windows has activation why doesn’t Visual Studio?

