<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Something rotten in the crotch of RSS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coreygo.com/index.php/2005/11/27/something-rotten-in-the-crotch-of-rss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coreygo.com/index.php/2005/11/27/something-rotten-in-the-crotch-of-rss/</link>
	<description>thoughts of the convoluted</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:07:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Ludington</title>
		<link>http://coreygo.com/index.php/2005/11/27/something-rotten-in-the-crotch-of-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Ludington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.coreygouker.com/2005/11/27/SomethingRottenInTheCrotchOfRSS.aspx#comment-117</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s two very good reasons not to offer full text: 
 
1) Sites who regularly rip off other people&#039;s content have a field day with full text. Nothing makes me madder than seeing someone else generating ad dollars from articles I invested my time in researching and writing. 
 
2) If I offer full text, I don&#039;t get paid for my time. I might lose a few people reading the feeds, but the revenue increase I gained from turning off full text on my own feeds made up for any ubergeeks who no longer subscribe. 
 
As long as you don&#039;t care about generating revenue from your blog, then full text is certainly the way to go. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s two very good reasons not to offer full text:</p>
<p>1) Sites who regularly rip off other people&#039;s content have a field day with full text. Nothing makes me madder than seeing someone else generating ad dollars from articles I invested my time in researching and writing.</p>
<p>2) If I offer full text, I don&#039;t get paid for my time. I might lose a few people reading the feeds, but the revenue increase I gained from turning off full text on my own feeds made up for any ubergeeks who no longer subscribe.</p>
<p>As long as you don&#039;t care about generating revenue from your blog, then full text is certainly the way to go. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using xcache (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching using xcache
Object Caching 386/394 objects using xcache

Served from: coreygo.com @ 2012-05-21 09:36:16 -->
