Posts Tagged ‘Vista’

Microsoft LifeChat ZX-6000 doubles as Xbox 360 wireless receiver and headset for Skype.

Posted By Corey on March 21st, 2007

Jon ordered a new Microsoft LifeChat ZX-6000 from Amazon (using some major credit) which arrived today. There’s little information about this headset, I didn’t even really know it existed till he brought it up. So yeah, no real information about the base unit but we figured it was free credit so might as well try. Opened it up and sure enough the base unit reads Microsoft Xbox 360 Wireless Receiver for Windows. Plug it in, Vista sees it, it doesn’t find drivers, Jon downloads the drivers from Microsoft Hardware. Install takes a good 5 minutes for the 3MB setup, totally lame, especially on Vista. The headset worked perfectly, pressed the button and up came WLM8.1, we then tried pairing the Xbox 360 Wireless controller, it paired just fine as well. Then did a short Skype call after setting the input and output to echo123 and that also worked perfectly. So awesome, a good solution to kill two birds with one stone. Only caveat that I can see is that after testing with the Xbox 360 itself I can’t find a way to pair the headset with the 360. Regardless considering the receiver is $20 normally getting a nice headset and a good way to do wireless calls with Skype is worth the $30.

Posted in Uncategorized

Shock! Creative finally release non beta drivers for the rest of the X-Fi audio cards.

Posted By Corey on March 9th, 2007

Despite the fact that Vista shipped 4 months and a day ago + the 5 years of development time, Creative has just now finally decided to do some work and ship what should hopefully be some quality non beta drivers. Granted this hasn’t stopped some OEM’s, like Dell, from shipping logo’d systems with Vista and XtremeMusic cards with beta Creative drivers (oh and these aren’t even the latest beta drivers Creative made available)! :-P

The new drivers can be found here (narrowed down to the XtremeMusic that I own, oh and if you have an Audigy 2, non beta drivers are available now as well):

The drivers download there supports the following audio devices only:

  • Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic,
  • Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer
  • Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Platinum
  • Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty
  • Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Elite Pro

Oh and to just prove that Creative aren’t a bunch of idiots and haven’t been sitting on their hands all this time since Vista shipped:

Known issues:

  • This driver does not support the following:
    • Decoding of Dolby® Digital and DTS™ signals
    • DVD-Audio
    • DirectSound®-based EAX games
    • 6.1 speaker mode.
  • SPDIF passthrough is supported on Vista 32-bit only.
  • Applications from the original Sound Blaster X-Fi CD will not work with this download.

Sure the entire bloody audio architecture in Vista changed, but there have been years of ramp up now. To release drivers this late and with a plethora of known issues that people care about, well, that’s just unforgiveable. It’s no wonder why you’re losing the market and everyone just sticks with onboard AC’97 and now the far better HD Audio.

I’ve been running the beta drivers now on a 4.9 WEI system with my XtremeMusic and I can’t even move a file from one folder to another without having WMP or VLC crackle and pop while playing music. All I can say is that unless this driver release or a new driver release in the next 90 days resolve this I will never buy a Creative product ever again.

Posted in Uncategorized

Longhorn Server: Broadcom networking woes on 9th gen Dell servers including my PowerEdge 2900.

Posted By Corey on February 21st, 2007

With the recent February CTP release of Longhorn Server I finally decided that since my Dell PowerEdge 2900 hasn’t really been fully configured. It’d be a good time to give Vista… err Longhorn Server a shot.

I’m still waiting in limbo for my fresh install with Exchange 2007 (waiting on that one little app that will make it all work like magic) on Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition x64 R2 (PLEASE PLEASE let them have some common sense with naming sometime this century).

The install of Longhorn Server went perfectly. I didn’t even have to provide drivers for my Dell PERC 5/i RAID controller which is awesome and as expected. The entire install took only 15 minutes which is great considering it’s a quad core server with 4GB of 667MHz FB-DIMM’s. I noticed right away that the no network connection icon was down there in the system tray so I immediately went to Device Manager. The two embedded NIC’s (Broadcom NetXtreme II 5708C’s) were just showing as Ethernet adapters.

Figuring first that the 2003 x64 drivers would work I went to the big RAID driver I’ve got, it wasn’t there. No biggy, it’s probably not mounted. Popped open Disk Management saw 3265GB (RAW) and nearly died of a heart attack. Remaining calm (knowing Microsoft couldn’t have just done something so stupid as wipe my drive), I gave the unmounted partition a drive letter and crossed my fingers as it was assigned to R: and showed the right amount of free space and NTFS. Now I’m sure the PM that thought this was a good idea had the best intentions but for the love of god man think again. Don’t you ever scare me or anyone else like that again. RAW == brand new drive / empty drive / drive with nothing on it. Don’t you dare say that my 3TB array is empty. List it as UNMOUNTED and pop a bloody dialog stating that I need to assign a drive letter. The last thing you want is some system admin working away on 100′s of systems to just format a drive with critical data on it.

I tried installing the NIC drivers from Dell and they didn’t work. I then tried the drivers from Broadcom for the NetXtreme II 5708C and they didn’t work. I then tried whatever Broadcom drivers came in Longhorn Server and those didn’t work. Finally I Googled and found, this, so I then tried the RIS drivers and unfortunately those didn’t work either. In fact Windows wouldn’t even boot complaining about the driver’s digital signature being unverified. So after trying every possible driver my 20 minutes with Longhorn Server is over and I’m going back to Server 2003. Maybe with Beta 3, maybe once Broadcom get there butts in motion (this isn’t a bloody Creative soundcard guys it’s a critical enterprise level NIC that’s shipped on nearly ALL 9th gen Dell servers, you’ve got Vista RTM get moving, Server shouldn’t be much of a leap). Clearly the issue is with the NDIS v5 Broadcom are using. And it’s probably also the root cause of all the issues I’ve been having with Virtual Sever 2005 and this NIC back on Windows Server 2003 as well.

There’s a part of me that just wants to give in and buy the Intel Pro/1000PT Dual Port PCIe x4 NIC and have the drivers built in and not have to worry but I’m not about to waste $170 on another NIC when I’ve got one that should be working perfectly. What a headache. :-(

Posted in Uncategorized

Auto Away Status in Windows Live Messenger 8.1 for Vista finally fixed…

Posted By Corey on February 15th, 2007

It’s been driving me nuts ever since I started using Vista but it’s finally been fixed. Apparently not caused by Plus! Live for Messenger nor WLM 8.1 itself but some bad bits for the Microsoft wireless mouse I’ve got. The fix went up on Windows Update the other day and since then things have been fine. The KB article for the fix is amusing to me since it talks about the issue possibly being caused by CyberLink software. Cute since this is a clean install and nothing other than WLM and Office 2007 have been installed. Either way the “HID Non-User Input Data Filter” fixes the auto away status in Messenger. My power management for disabling the monitors after 15 minutes has worked fine and the update hasn’t changed that. Jason Tsang also has a bit more information regarding the update.

Posted in Uncategorized

More Vista shell bugs and a minor annoyance from Sidebar.

Posted By Corey on February 1st, 2007

First an obvious one from the Sidebar… This is a known bug but it’s stupid and annoying. Notice anything in the linked screenshot? According to the Sidebar and according to the Display Settings the gadgets and such should be on the right side of my left monitor. Obviously they’re not. After a restart of the PC the Sidebar ends up in that location. At which point you have to pull up the properties again and set it to the right side of monitor 3.

If you have a sharp eye you might have also noticed something else. This one is a shell bug. Notice the taskbar has a bit more going on than it should? Especially over in that right side there’s just stuff that should definitely be black.

Here’s another example, you can clearly see what’s happening here. The taskbar glass effect is grabbing the wrong portion of the image for the effect. It’s taking the image from the 2nd monitor not the 1st. Here’s the actual background image (converted from a BMP). Jon and I thought the fix would be to just turn glass off then on so I restarted the DWM service that didn’t work. Neither did a restart. So we’re not sure if this is the same known bug we’ve seen during the beta or something else. The fix however is to turn on the auto-hiding of the taskbar. Immediately after doing that the problem is fixed. Disabling the auto-hiding breaks it again :-( .

One other thing you’ll notice from the background image is that it doesn’t quite match the screenshot of the desktop. Well this is more of a feature request and something that can be done with UltraMon but something clearly the shell team didn’t have time nor thought was worthy of doing for Vista. Basically I’ve got 3 24″ monitors at 1920×1200. I’ve got my main monitor 1 set to the middle where I like my taskbar. 2 is to the left, and 3 to the right. The problem is that I’m a bit more of a pixel perfectionist than most and so having one desktop background spread across all 3 monitors is a must. There’s only 2 ways of doing this. First is to use a third party app like UltraMon. And the second approach is to pop open Paint or Photoshop and create an image that’s the right size (5760×1200) in my case. Then paste in the 3 images to create one image to stretch about whichever way you’d please.

Now logic would dictact that WYSIWYG with the background image. You’d expect it to go 123, left, middle, right. Well that’s not the correct logic according to the methods used for the Desktop Background settings in Vista. If you have a set up similar to my circumstances, which I’ll concede many don’t… *cough* stupid speech recognition vulnerability. Then I’m just like some at ZDNet and I’d just be making something of nothing. However, if you also have Aristotle like perfection you’ll want to make sure your multimon background is set up right.

To do this you need to remember that Windows will start the background image from your “main” monitor and you need to have things set to Tile mode. In my case the monitors go 213. So while the start of image should be at the left mine is in the middle. Next you have to make sure the image flows and overflows from left to right, regardless of monitor numbering. To better illustrate this click here. Well, I hope that better illustrates things with the description:

1, Middle monitor = Left side of image in Photshop.
2, Left monitor = Right side of image in Photoshop.
3, Right monitor = Middle of image in Photoshop.

If not then maybe heading over to shellrevealed would be a good idea :-) . Tell them that you want to be able to set a different background image for each attached display and not have to deal with this mess. Finally if you like the backgrounds shown or want to see some other cool stuff head over to mandolux.

UPDATE: Dom and I were discussing how annoying desktop icons have become. I was ranting about how I wish the Recycle Bin were a sidebar thing instead of being the only desktop icon that I’d have floating around. So I disabled it in Personalization. He instead just unchecked Show Desktop Icons from the Properties menu on the Desktop. I gave this a go just for the heck of it since I’ve still got a couple other temporary icons on the desktop that I didn’t want to move and low and behold. The bloody taskbar glass bug was resolved. Obviously there’s something funky going on here and I’m sure it wasn’t really considered to be significant enough to fix since not enough people would hit it. At any rate, just a work around for anyone who wants to know…

Posted in Uncategorized